Wednesday, January 27, 2010

New Additions to my Dislike List: Andrew Keen and Doris Lessing

The only reason I use the word "dislike" rather than "hate" is because hate just seems too harsh, and I want to save that word for someone even more ignorant and elitist than these two fools (you have to pick and choose your battles- right?)

"Blah blah blah" was all I got from Andrew Keen's article about incredible (as in not-credible) amateurs using the internet to voice their opinions. Keen, who seems to have some twisted Napoleon Complex (yeah, I went there), fears the internet, its power, and more importantly, the power that the internet takes away from people like him. Does it scare you that I no longer have to look to pompous smarty pants like you for answers?

Now I cn jst Wiki frm my Blkberry!

Does that bother you, little man? I don't need your snuffy Professor friends or a print version of the Wall Street Journal (which I do read..every single day). I can read my newspaper just fine..from my Kindle!

What about you, Miz NoBeL PrIzE WiNnEr? Think the internet makes us dumb? How does it make you feel that I just reduced you to a Wiki Article?

I attribute the lack of appreciation for the internet and all of the wonderful things it has done to a general ignorance and fear of change.

Can I have my Nobel Prize now? K thnx.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Crowdsourcing..Like Crowdsurfing, But Not.

Crowdsourcing, as defined by Wikipedia, is outsourcing a task or problem to a group of people via an open forum, which (depending on who you ask) is exactly what Wikipedia does. But not everyone would agree with this term.

Dan Woods, for example, would argue that what we define as crowdsourcing is actually more like virtuoso search, because when these problems are sent out to the masses, they are usually answered by experts not "average joes".

The people who fill out the articles on Wikipedia, for example, are usually experts (self-proclaimed?...maybe) who are motivated to answer Wikipedia's call. The most I've ever published on Wikipedia was adding my birthday to the list of important things that occured on May 23rd and it was deleted 5 minutes later.

What about the people who answer problems using Blue Gene, IBM's super computer. They're actually super geniuses. These are highly educated individuals who use the computer center to solve extremely difficult problems like Influenza Virus Mutations. They're not in there making scrapbooks or putting together a travel guide.

Which is why I've got to agree with Woods. People need to understand that when you put emphasis on the word "crowd" it leads us to believe that it's ordinary people who are figuring out these complex algorithms or writing articles about Benedict Arnold, when its not. It takes someone educated (or slightly obsessed) in these topics to answer these questions.

My next big Wikipedia move will be adding this blog to the list of The Best Blogs Awards (otherwise known as the BOBs).

Have a great night :)

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Manipulation and Tweaking of all sorts!

Recently, I read an article called “Six degrees of Lois Weisberg” by Malcolm Gladwell. Weisberg, dubbed a “connector” by Gladwell, was born in 1925 and has devoted a large part of her life to fundraising and philanthropy in the Chicago area. The article, which highlights all of the great (and not to mention exciting) things that Weisberg has done credits her accomplishments to her effortless ability to make friends from all walks of life.


At first, all of the things that she had done and all of the famous and interesting people that she had met made me think, “wow, this woman really is a connector, a socialite in her own right”. But then I realized something. All of the things she’s done and people she’s met arent simply because of her ability to meet people and be charistmatic, she is also an affluent woman. Daughter of a judge, wife of an attorney, ex-wife of a dug store owner. She isn’t exactly the homeless woman walking down the street.

But she also isn’t miss popularity. In fact, I’m curious as to how many people actually know who Lois Weisberg is. Because, and I'm making an assumption here, the only reason that Gladwell knows who Lois Weisberg is is because he was her son’s roommate in college. Lets say my roommates parents were Ambassadors, or Diplomats, and I decided to look at their social network. Would it not be similar to Weisberg’s? And would writing an essay about them not be the very same thing that Gladwell did?


Lois Weisberg-affluent white American woman, born and raised during a time of political, social, and economic unrest. Did all of these factors pave the way for her? Is she a so-called “connecter” because she had time to socialize with the best of the best? I bet its a lot easier to raise money privately when you’re attending “power lunches” with Chicago elite. And what about her hitting up billionaire John D. MacArthur for money to fund a festival? I mean, she was eating at the Pump Room. It’s not like they ran into each other at Fridays (as if.). For those of you who don’t know what the Pump Room is check it out here (they refer to themselves as having attracted Hollywoods greatest- go figure).


Hmmm, all of the pieces are starting to come together now, aren’t they? As the saying goes, all of the stars were just perfectly aligned to make it all work for Weisberg. Now, I do think that everything that she has done for her community is wonderful, but it’s definitely no coincidence. And I wouldn’t say that her ability to communicate with others is the only player in her game of Life.


With all that said, I think that while this article really pinpointed the importance and power of communication, Gladwell was able to manipulate reality. He took a concept, communication and its role in society, and then found a story to make it fit. Not the other way around.


On that note, another article I read looked at researchers at MIT and reality mining. Measuring real-life data, and using it to predict communication patterns and gain insight as to how people communicate in the real world. What they found was that groups are more efficient when the team members know each other well and feel more comfortable around one another.


This leads us to the importance of tweaking reality. If two employee’s in an office don’t know each other well then perhaps it is in the best interest of the company that they start getting to know each other. Even if they work in different departments, you never know when a vital piece of information could be exchanged between the two of them that otherwise may have never occurred. The ability to map out this kind of information, who knows who, who is going out with who, can be of tremendous value to companies big and small.


Then again, these are the kinds of things that Lois Weisberg has been doing for years, tightening networks and whatnot. Why has it taken us so long to get on board, could it be that social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter are making us impersonal recluses?


Doubtful, I think that the advances in social communication thanks to these sites have increased our ability to make new friends as well as rekindle old relationships. Life is about balance people. Talk to your friends on facebook, but once in a while go out for lunch or coffee, too.


Check out the articles I mentioned here and here


Well, I'm on my way out now. Going to Five Guys, maybe I'll run in to the Obama's and ask them to give me money for a little party I'm throwing.


Just kidding, Haiti is way more important right now, and you can do you part by donating to Haiti relief funds.


Some big ones are the American Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, and more recently created, the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund. Awkward, but ANYTHING for a good cause ladies and gents!


Have a great day :)

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Oh ya know, the FIRST!

Welcome everybody to my new- and FIRST blog! My name is Vivian and I am a student in Washington, DC. For the next few months I'm going to be using this blogging for my social networking class. Exciting, no? No worries though, just because this blog is for class doesn't mean it's going to be boring (you're just going to have to *trust* me on this one).

Oh, and speaking of trust...

On my honor, all posts on this blog are my own.

;)

I'm off now, but I hope to see you back here REAL soon!

la de daaa,
Vivi